A week after a session of the House Judiciary Committee on Search Engine Biases, Donald Trump Wolf is still crying on Twitter, Technology companies such as Google and the platform itself claim to be a boon to Saleh's political rivals.
According to data from Brandwatch Analytics, Trump has been absent from bias at least 25 times since taking office. Google's chief executive, Sander Bechai, had to explain how gigantic searches handled 3.5 billion queries a day without a liberal agenda. Although Bechai has testified that he leads "this company without political bias and action[s] To be sure of that [Google’s] Products continued to work that way, Republicans remained skeptical.
For example, Lamar Smith of Texas, for example, insisted, "Those who write algorithms get the results they should want." MP Steve Shabout, R Ohio, questioned why the negative news outweighs the positive coverage in the search for Republican legislation. Victories such as the US Health Care Act or the Tax and Job Tax Reduction Act.
The question of how to determine Google search results has been the subject of sharp debate since the dawn of search engine optimization in the 1990s. To a certain extent, the only constant is change, as evidenced by an endless stream of algorithm updates over the next 20 years or so with adorable names such as Panda, Penguin, Hummingbird, RankBrain, Mobilegeddon and Fred.
But that's the thing – Google will not simply deliver a secret sauce recipe at Big Mac and that's its search results.
"Google's dilemma is that they do not want to disclose that internal business, and are particularly sensitive to any discoveries about user signals that affect the results, so they can not reveal evidence that might help refute these conspiracy theories," said Bete Myers, Analysis Company Moz. "On a typical day, they are more willing to take a minor public relations blow than to reveal the inner workings of the algorithm."
How can Trump be somewhat, somehow
But the issue is not black and white. In fact, Will Crichlow, chief executive of Distributed Marketing Online, said there are many ways in which Google can actually move.
What Trump, Smith, and Shabout referred to is active bias, meaning that Google engineers deliberately bypass the algorithm to match their views. However, Crichlow noted another possible form: unconscious bias, meaning that they do not deliberately try to influence the results, but the results they think are best are those that are consistent with their views.
"Another challenge is to try to blow up evil [versus] Cross-bias, Myers said. "Google can be training systems on biased data, for example, even if you do not intend to."
There's also the problem of corporate bias, where Google gives a higher ranking to trusted, trusted, and often cited sites. Thus, Crichlow said Republicans may feel biased toward lesser-known sites because they see results from well-known sources such as the New York Times and The Washington Post, which they claim to be biased.
"This is not for political reasons, but because it is the best result across a wide range of inquiries," Crichlow said.
International SEO consultant Gianluca Fiorelli pointed out that Google can also reduce websites that have been reported as unreliable if verified by using the ClaimReview Schema review.
"Marked more … Sites on it are not [trustworthy]"The less they appear in organic research," Fiorelli said.
Do reptiles make good pets?
In a blog published earlier this year, Danny Sullivan, a long-time research reporter who is currently working as a "search compass" for the mother ship, tackled problems in the privileged excerpts that resulted in answers such as "The Wicked Woman" and "Barack Obama Planned" For a coup.